Torsades de pointes and myocardial infarction following reversal of supraventricular tachycardia with adenosine: a case report.

Adenosine is an antiarrhythmic drug that slows conduction through the atrioventricular node and acts as a coronary blood vessel dilator. This case report highlights two unusual life-threatening events following the use of adenosine to revert supraventricular tachycardia in a structurally normal heart: non-sustained polymorphic ventricular tachycardia and myocardial infarction. A 46-year-old woman presented to the emergency department with a two-hour history of palpitations and was diagnosed with supraventricular tachycardia. Vagal maneuvers were ineffective, and after intravenous adenosine administration, the patient presented with chest pain and hypotension. The rhythm degenerated into non-sustained polymorphic ventricular tachycardia and spontaneously reverted to sinus rhythm with ST elevation in lead aVR and ST depression in the inferior and anterolateral leads. The patient spontaneously recovered within a few minutes. Despite successful arrhythmia reversal, the patient was admitted to the intensive care unit because of an infarction without obstructive atherosclerosis. This report aims to alert emergency physicians about the potential complications associated with supraventricular tachycardia and its reversal with adenosine.

Drugs associated with a risk of supraventricular tachycardia: analysis using the OpenVigil database.

OBJECTIVE: The OpenVigil database can be used to assess medications that may cause supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) and to produce a reference for their safe use in clinical settings. METHODS: We analyzed first-quarter data from 2004 to 2023, obtained by searching the OpenVigil database using the keyword "supraventricular tachycardia." Trade names and generic names were obtained by querying the RxNav database, and the proportions were summarized. The proportionate reporting ratio (PRR), reporting odds ratio, and chi-square values were also summarized. We created Asahi diagrams and set the screening criteria to drug events ≥30, PRR >2, and chi-square >4. Outcomes were evaluated using the Side Effect Resource database, several scientific literature databases, and the Hangzhou Yiyao Rational Medication System. RESULTS: A total of 2435 distinct medications were found to induce SVT between the first quarter of 2004 and 2023, leading to 22,375 documented adverse events related to SVT. Further investigation revealed that salbutamol, paroxetine, formoterol, paclitaxel, venlafaxine, and theophylline were most likely to cause SVT. CONCLUSION: We conducted signal mining of adverse drug events using the OpenVigil database and evaluated the six drugs most likely to cause SVT. The results of this research can serve as a drug safety reference in the clinic.

Plain language summary of the safety and effectiveness of etripamil for atrioventricular-nodal-dependent supraventricular tachycardia: the RAPID study.

WHAT IS THIS SUMMARY ABOUT?: This is a plain language summary of a clinical research study called RAPID. The study looked at the potential for how safe and effective etripamil was at stopping an episode of rapid heartbeats in people with atrioventricularnodal-dependent supraventricular tachycardia (AV-node-dependent SVT). An episode is used to describe the period of time when a person experiences an abnormally very fast heartbeat. This was done by comparing an investigational drug called etripamil with a placebo, each administered via a rapidly acting nasal spray. AV-node-dependent SVT affects the rhythm of the heart, causing it to suddenly beat rapidly. The condition often requires medical treatment to help return the heart to its normal, healthy heartbeat pattern and speed, called 'sinus rhythm'. Researchers are looking at ways of improving the management of supraventricular tachycardias (SVT) by reducing the need for patients to attend an urgent care clinic, emergency ward or hospital for treatment. In the RAPID study, participants used a nasal spray containing either 70 mg etripamil or a placebo solution when they experienced an episode of SVT. The researchers wanted to know how long it took for each participant's rapid heartbeat to return to sinus rhythm after administering the etripamil or placebo nasal spray. Participants in the study were considered successfully treated if their heartbeats returned to sinus rhythm for at least 30 seconds within 30 minutes of using the nasal spray. Although 30 seconds may seem brief, it's medically important because it shows that a person's heartbeat has been temporarily stabilized and returned to normal functioning. WHAT WERE THE RESULTS?: Out of 99 people who used etripamil during an SVT episode, 63 participants (64%) experienced a return to sinus rhythm for at least 30 seconds within 30 minutes after using the nasal spray. In contrast, 26 out of 85 participants (31%) who used the placebo nasal spray experienced a return to sinus rhythm for at least 30 seconds within 30 minutes after use. Furthermore, the average time taken for the return to sinus rhythm was 17 minutes for the etripamil group which was 3-times faster than the placebo group at 53 minutes. Also, in the study no serious side effects occurred that were related to etripamil. WHAT DO THE RESULTS OF THE STUDY MEAN?: The RAPID study supports the potential that etripamil may be safe and well tolerated by participants as a treatment for episodes of rapid heartbeat in people with AV-node-dependent SVT. The results also showed a significant improvement in symptoms following treatment with etripamil.

Combined modified Valsalva maneuver with adenosine supraventricular tachycardia: A comparative study.

BACKGROUND AND IMPORTANCE: Paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT) is an arrhythmia commonly seen in the emergency department. Both modified Valsalva maneuver (MVM) and intravenous adenosine are the first line treatment, of which the former has e lower success rate while the latter has a higher success rate but some risks and adverse effects. Given both of these reverse rhythms quickly, combining them may achieve a better effect. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to evaluate the success rate and potential risk of combining the use of intravenous adenosine while patients were doing MVM as a treatment for paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia(pSVT). DESIGN, SETTINGS AND PARTICIPANTS: We recruited patients with pSVT from 2017 to 2022, and randomly assigned them into 3 groups, MVM group, intravenous adenosine group, and combination therapy group, in which MVM was allowed to be performed twice, while intravenous adenosine was given in a titration manner to repeat three times, recorded the success rate and side effects in each group. MAIN RESULTS: The success rate of the MVM group, adenosine group, and combination group are 42.11%, 75.00 and 86.11%, respectively. The success rate of the adenosine group and combination group is significantly higher than the n MVSM group (p < 0.01, p < 0.001), while the success rate of the combination group is higher than the adenosine group, it has no significant difference (p = 0.340). In terms of safety, the longest RR durations (asystole period) are 1.61 s, 1.60s, and 2.27 s, there is a statistical difference among the three groups (p < 0.01) and between the adenosine and combination group (0.018). CONCLUSION: Therefore, we can conclude that combination therapy has a relatively high success rate and good safety profile, but the current study failed to show its superiority to adenosine.

Rationale and design of the NODE-303 study: evaluating the safety of symptom-prompted, self-administered etripamil for paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia episodes in real-world settings.

BACKGROUND: Paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT) is a common episodic arrhythmia characterized by unpredictable onset and burdensome symptoms including palpitations, dizziness, chest pain, distress, and shortness of breath. Treatment of acute episodes of PSVT in the clinical setting consists of intravenous adenosine, beta-blockers, and calcium channel blockers (CCBs). Etripamil is an intranasally self-administered L-type CCB in development for acute treatment of AV-nodal dependent PSVT in a nonmedical supervised setting. METHODS: This paper summarizes the rationale and study design of NODE-303 that will assess the efficacy and safety of etripamil. In the randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, Phase 3 RAPID trial, etripamil was superior to placebo in the conversion of single PSVT episodes by 30 minutes post initial dose when administered in the nonhealthcare setting; this study required a mandatory and observed test dosing prior to randomization. The primary objective of NODE-303 is to evaluate the safety of symptom-prompted, self-administered etripamil for multiple PSVT episodes in real-world settings, without the need for test dosing prior to first use during PSVT. Secondary endpoints include efficacy and disease burden. Upon perceiving a PSVT episode, the patient applies an electrocardiographic monitor, performs a vagal maneuver, and, if the vagal maneuver is unsuccessful, self-administers etripamil 70 mg, with an optional repeat dose if symptoms do not resolve within 10 minutes after the first dose. A patient may treat up to four PSVT episodes during the study. Adverse events are recorded as treatment-emergent if they occur within 24 hours after the administration of etripamil. RESULTS: Efficacy endpoints include time to conversion to sinus rhythm within 30 and 60 minutes after etripamil administration, and the proportion of patients who convert at 3, 5, 10, 20, 30, and 60 minutes. Patient-reported outcomes are captured by the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire, the Cardiac Anxiety Questionnaire, the Short Form Health Survey 36, the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication and a PSVT survey. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, these data will support the development of a potentially paradigm-changing long-term management strategy for recurrent PSVT.

Impact of dexmedetomidine on electrophysiological properties and arrhythmia inducibility in adult patients referred for reentrant supraventricular tachycardia ablation.

BACKGROUND: Drugs used for sedation/analgesia may affect the basic cardiac electrophysiologic properties or even supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) inducibility. Dexmedetomidine (DEX) is a selective alpha-2 adrenergic agonist with sedative and analgesic properties. A comprehensive evaluation on use of DEX for reentrant SVT ablation in adults is lacking. The present study aims to systematically assess the impact of DEX on cardiac electrophysiology and SVT inducibility. METHODS: Hemodynamic, electrocardiographic, and electrophysiological parameters and SVT inducibility were assessed before and after DEX infusion in patients scheduled for ablation of reentrant SVT. RESULTS: The population of this prospective observational study included 55 patients (mean age of 58.7 ± 14 years, 29 males [52.7%]). A decrease in systolic and diastolic blood pressure and in heart rate was observed after DEX infusion (p = 0.001 for all). DEX increased corrected sinus node refractory time, atrial effective refractory period, AH interval, AV Wenckebach cycle length, and AV node effective refractory period without affecting the His-Purkinje conduction or ventricular myocardium refractoriness. No AV blocks or sinus arrests occurred during DEX infusion. Globally, there was no difference in SVT inducibility in basal condition or after DEX infusion (46/55 [83.6%] vs. 43/55 [78.1%] patients; p = 0.55), without a difference in isoprenaline use (p = 1.0). In 4 (7.3%) cases, the SVT was inducible only after DEX infusion. In 34.5% of cases, DEX infusion unmasked the presence of an obstructive sleeping respiratory pattern, represented mainly by snoring. CONCLUSIONS: DEX depresses sinus node function and prolongs atrioventricular refractoriness without significantly affecting the rate of SVT inducibility in patients scheduled for reentrant SVT ablation.

Management of acute supraventricular tachycardia in children.

QUESTION: Recently, a 3-year-old patient in my practice urgently needed to go to the emergency department. The patient was found to have supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) and needed immediate treatment with adenosine. What evidence is currently available for management of SVT in children? ANSWER: Supraventricular tachycardia is a common cardiac condition in the pediatric population that manifests as a narrow QRS complex tachycardia on electrocardiography. Symptoms may range from palpitations, poor feeding, and irritability to more substantial hemodynamic instability. Patients who are hemodynamically stable can benefit from interventions such as vagal maneuvers, which can be done in the office. Such maneuvers include the Valsalva maneuver, stimulation of the diving reflex (for infants), and unilateral carotid sinus massage. Other children may need pharmacologic therapies to restore normal heart rhythm, which usually consists of a rapid intravenous injection of adenosine under monitoring. For patients who are hemodynamically unstable, emergency cardioversion may be needed.

Rediscover the predictive capacity of B-type natriuretic peptide applied to neonatal supraventricular tachycardia.

BACKGROUND: Supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) is one of the most common non-benign arrhythmias in neonates, potentially leading to cardiac decompensation. This study investigated the early risk factors of acute heart failure (AHF) secondary to SVT in neonates, and explored their value in guiding the selection of effective anti-arrhythmic treatment. METHODS: A total of 43 newborns diagnosed with and treated for SVT between January 2017 and December 2022 were analyzed. According to the presence of AHF after restoring sinus rhythm in newborns with SVT, they were divided into SVT with AHF group and SVT without AHF group. Clinical data and anti-arrhythmic therapies were analyzed. Risk factors of AHF secondary to SVT in neonates were determined using logistic regression. The cut-off value for predictors of AHF secondary to SVT and demanding of a second-line anti-arrhythmic treatment was determined through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. RESULTS: Time to initial control of tachycardia > 24 h, hyperkalemia, anemia, and plasma B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) were identified as risk factors of AHF secondary to SVT in neonates. BNP exhibited AUC of 0.80 in predicting AHF, and BNP > 2460.5pg/ml (OR 2.28, 95% CI 1.27 ~ 45.39, P = 0.03) was an independent predictor, yielding sensitivity of 70.6% and specificity of 84.6%. Neonates with BNP > 2460.5pg/ml (37.5% versus 7.4%, P = 0.04) had a higher demand for a second line anti-arrhythmic treatment to terminate SVT, with sensitivity and specificity for BNP in predicting at 75.0%, 71.4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: BNP could be used to predict an incident of AHF secondary to SVT and a demand of second-line anti-arrhythmic treatment to promptly terminate SVT and prevent decompensation in neonates.

Refractory supraventricular fetal tachycardia as a cause of non-immune hydrops: management conundrum.

Supraventricular tachyarrhythmia (SVT) is the most common form of fetal tachyarrhythmias. The presentation can vary from ill-defined, non-sustained episodes of tachyarrhythmia to frank non-immune hydrops. The standard of care is transplacental therapy by treating the mother with oral antiarrhythmic drugs, followed by direct fetal therapy in refractory cases. We report a case of primigravida in her late 20s, who presented at 28.1 weeks of gestation with fetal hydrops and SVT. She was initially managed with oral digoxin and flecainide, but due to worsening hydrops, risk of fetal demise and extreme prematurity, further management by direct fetal therapy was given in terms of intramuscular digoxin and intraperitoneal flecainide. Following which, the fetus had a favourable outcome. This case highlights the possible role of direct fetal therapy in refractory cases of SVT.

Etripamil Nasal Spray for Conversion of Repeated Spontaneous Episodes of Paroxysmal Supraventricular Tachycardia During Long-Term Follow-Up: Results From the NODE-302 Study.

Background Self-administration of investigational intranasal L-type calcium channel blocker etripamil during paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT) appeared safe and well-tolerated in the phase 3 NODE-301 (Multi-Centre, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Efficacy, and Safety Study of Etripamil Nasal Spray for the Termination of Spontaneous Episodes of Paroxysmal Supraventricular Tachycardia) trial of adults with sustained atrioventricular nodal-dependent PSVT. The NODE-302 open-label extension further characterized etripamil safety and efficacy. Methods and Results Eligible patients were monitored via self-applied cardiac monitoring system for 5 hours after etripamil self-administration. The primary end point was time-to-conversion of positively adjudicated PSVT to sinus rhythm after etripamil treatment. Probability of conversion to sinus rhythm was reported via Kaplan-Meier plot. Adverse events were based on self-reported symptoms and clinical evaluations. Among 169 patients enrolled, 105 self-administered etripamil ≥1 time for perceived PSVT (median [range], 232 [8-584] days' follow-up). Probability of conversion within 30 minutes of etripamil was 60.2% (median time to conversion, 15.5 minutes) among 188 PSVT episodes (92 patients) positively adjudicated as atrioventricular nodal dependent by independent ECG analysis. Among 40 patients who self-treated 2 episodes, 75% had a significantly consistent response by 30 minutes; 9 did not convert on either episode, and 21 converted on both episodes (χ2=8.09; P=0.0045). Forty-five of 105 patients (42.9%) had ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse event, generally transient and mild-to-moderate, including nasal congestion (14.3%), nasal discomfort (14.3%), or rhinorrhea (12.4%). No serious cardiac safety events were observed within 24 hours of etripamil. Conclusions In this extension study, investigational etripamil nasal spray was well tolerated for self-treating recurrent episodes of PSVT without medical supervision. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03635996.

Termination of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia by intranasal swab insertion.

Paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) is a common emergency department presentation. Vagal maneuvers are commonly tried to terminate SVT but are often unsuccessful in terminating the dysrhythmia. The use of adenosine, while often successful, is associated with a number of side effects and is often disliked by patients with recurrent episodes of SVT. We report on a 44-year-old woman with a past medical history of SVT who presented to the emergency department (ED) due to a recurrence of her SVT. The patient had no intravenous access and preferred not to receive adenosine. The patient received intranasal stimulation with a nasopharyngeal swab used for COVID-19 testing for 5-10 s. After less than 10 s, the patient converted to a sinus rhythm. She was successfully discharged from the ED after 1 h of observation and no recurrence of her SVT.

Patient Characteristics Associated with Hospital Admission or Antiarrhythmic Medication Changes After Emergency Department Evaluation of Supraventricular Tachycardia.

BACKGROUND: Supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) is a relatively frequent diagnosis in the pediatric emergency department (ED). However, there are no consensus guidelines for ED disposition, and there are limited data on ED outcomes. Better understanding of those who are admitted or have antiarrhythmic medication changes may avoid potentially unnecessary transfers or admissions. Our objective was to identify patient factors associated with discharge from the emergency department without medication initiation or modification after management of SVT in the pediatric ED. DESIGN/METHODS: A retrospective review of children aged 0-18 years seen in the emergency department for SVT was conducted using electronic medical record data over a ten-year period at a single academic tertiary children's hospital. Patients with congenital cardiac disease or prior cardiac surgeries were excluded. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine association between patient factors of interest and the primary outcome of admission and secondary outcome of change to antiarrhythmic medications. RESULTS: We analyzed 197 patients encounters. The mean age was 7 years. Of these 104 (52.8%) were admitted to the hospital or discharged with antiarrhythmic medication changes. This primary outcome was associated with younger age (aOR 0.77, 95% CI 0.67-0.86), history of pre-excitation (aOR 5.82, 95% CI 2.01-18.8), intercurrent illness (aOR 3.75, 95% CI 1.27-12.1), number of adenosine doses prior to arrival (aOR 5.45, 95% CI 1.55-22.3), and in-person cardiology consultation (aOR 6.42, 95% CI 2.43-19.4). CONCLUSIONS: Nearly half of children treated in a pediatric ED for SVT are discharged without changes in medications. We identified patient factors associated with hospital admission or antiarrhythmic medication changes. These factors represent high value care and can be assessed when considering transfer from a referring facility. Risk stratification using these patient characteristics may reduce potentially avoidable transfers and admissions.

Coumel tachycardia in children.

BACKGROUND: Coumel tachycardia is an infrequent form of supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) that usually occurs in infants and children. It is a tachycardia mediated by an accessory pathway with retrograde slow conduction that explains the classic ECG pattern with long RP' interval and negative P waves in leads II, III, and aVF. In this study, we describe the clinical course and management of Coumel tachycardia in children. CASE REPORT: We conducted a retrospective review of five consecutive pediatric patients, mean age 11 ± 3 years (range 6 to 14). The first episode of SVT was at a mean age of 10.4 ± 4.8 years (range 2 to 14) with a mean evolution of 7.4 ± 9.4 months (range 1 to 24). Pharmacological therapy was unsuccessful despite the combination of antiarrhythmic drugs. The tachycardia was incessant with a density > 85% by 24-hour Holter monitoring; one patient developed tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy. All children underwent successful radiofrequency catheter ablation, mean 5 ± 3 applications (range 1 to 8) with a single session and with no complications. After a mean follow-up of 24 ± 16 months, all patients were asymptomatic and recurrence-free without antiarrhythmic treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Coumel tachycardia is clinically persistent and usually refractory to antiarrhythmic treatment with substantial risk of tachycardia-mediated cardiomyopathy. Catheter ablation is effective and safe in children; thus, it should be indicated promptly and based on individual selection.

INTRODUCCIÓN: La taquicardia de Coumel es una forma poco frecuente de taquicardia supraventricular que suele presentarse en lactantes. Es una taquicardia mediada por una vía accesoria de conducción lenta retrógrada que explica el patrón ECG clásico con intervalo RP' largo y ondas P negativas en las derivaciones II, III y aVF. En este trabajo se describe el curso clínico y el manejo de la taquicardia de Coumel en niños. CASO CLÍNICO: Se llevó a cabo una revisión retrospectiva de cinco pacientes pediátricos consecutivos, con una media de edad de 11 ± 3 años (intervalos 6 a 14). El primer episodio de taquicardia 10.4 ± 4.8 años con evolución de 7.4 ± 9.4 meses. El tratamiento farmacológico fue ineficaz a pesar de la combinación de antiarrítmicos. La taquicardia era incesante con una densidad > 85% por Holter-24h; un paciente desarrolló miocardiopatía inducida por taquicardia. Todos los niños fueron sometidos a ablación con catéter y radiofrecuencia con éxito, y un promedio de 5 ± 3 aplicaciones en una sola sesión y sin complicaciones. Después de un seguimiento de 24 ± 16 meses, todos los pacientes fueron asintomáticos y libres de recurrencia sin tratamiento antiarrítmico. CONCLUSIONES: La taquicardia de Coumel es clínicamente persistente y generalmente refractaria al tratamiento antiarrítmico con un riesgo sustancial de miocardiopatía mediada por taquicardia. La ablación con catéter es eficaz y segura en niños, por lo que debe indicarse de forma temprana y en lactantes de una selección individual.

Etripamil Nasal Spray: Therapeutic Potential for Treating Paroxysmal Supraventricular Tachycardia.

Patients with arrythmias are at an increased risk of heart-related comorbidities and complications. Specifically, patients with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT), a type of arrythmia, are at increased risk of lightheadedness or shortness of breath, due to the increased rate of the heartbeat. Most patients are prescribed oral medications to control their heart rates and maintain a normal heart rhythm. Researchers have been tasked with discovering alternative treatment options with new delivery methods to treat arrythmias such as PSVT. A nasal spray was subsequently designed and is currently undergoing clinical studies. This review aims to present and discuss the current clinical and scientific evidence pertaining to etripamil.

Self-administered intranasal etripamil using a symptom-prompted, repeat-dose regimen for atrioventricular-nodal-dependent supraventricular tachycardia (RAPID): a multicentre, randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: Etripamil is a fast-acting, intranasally administered calcium-channel blocker in development for on-demand therapy outside a health-care setting for paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of etripamil 70 mg nasal spray using a symptom-prompted, repeat-dose regimen for acute conversion of atrioventricular-nodal-dependent paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia to sinus rhythm within 30 min. METHODS: RAPID was a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, event-driven trial, conducted at 160 sites in North America and Europe as part 2 of the NODE-301 study. Eligible patients were aged at least 18 years and had a history of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia with sustained, symptomatic episodes (≥20 min) as documented by electrocardiogram. Patients were administered two test doses of intranasal etripamil (each 70 mg, 10 min apart) during sinus rhythm; those who tolerated the test doses were randomly assigned (1:1) using an interactive response technology system to receive either etripamil or placebo. Prompted by symptoms of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia, patients self-administered a first dose of intranasal 70 mg etripamil or placebo and, if symptoms persisted beyond 10 min, a repeat dose. Continuously recorded electrocardiographic data were adjudicated, by individuals masked to patient assignment, for the primary endpoint of time to conversion of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia to sinus rhythm for at least 30 s within 30 min after the first dose, which was measured in all patients who administered blinded study drug for a confirmed atrioventricular-nodal-dependent event. Safety outcomes were assessed in all patients who self-administered blinded study drug for an episode of perceived paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03464019, and is complete. FINDINGS: Between Oct 13, 2020, and July 20, 2022, among 692 patients randomly assigned, 184 (99 from the etripamil group and 85 from the placebo group) self-administered study drug for atrioventricular-nodal-dependent paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia, with diagnosis and timing confirmed. Kaplan-Meier estimates of conversion rates by 30 min were 64% (63/99) with etripamil and 31% (26/85) with placebo (hazard ratio 2·62; 95% CI 1·66-4·15; p<0·0001). Median time to conversion was 17·2 min (95% CI 13·4-26·5) with the etripamil regimen versus 53·5 min (38·7-87·3) with placebo. Prespecified sensitivity analyses of the primary assessment were conducted to test robustness, yielding supporting results. Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 68 (50%) of 99 patients treated with etripamil and 12 (11%) of 85 patients in the placebo group, most of which were located at the administration site and were mild or moderate, and all of which were transient and resolved without intervention. Adverse events occurring in at least 5% of patients treated with etripamil were nasal discomfort (23%), nasal congestion (13%), and rhinorrhea (9%). No serious etripamil-related adverse events or deaths were reported. INTERPRETATION: Using a symptom-prompted, self-administered, initial and optional-repeat-dosing regimen, intranasal etripamil was well tolerated, safe, and superior to placebo for the rapid conversion of atrioventricular-nodal-dependent paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia to sinus rhythm. This approach could empower patients to treat paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia themselves outside of a health-care setting, and has the potential to reduce the need for additional medical interventions, such as intravenous medications given in an acute-care setting. FUNDING: Milestone Pharmaceuticals.